Wednesday, October 14, 2009

The Politics of Yellow Cake

The Politics of Yellow Cake


Further to "
Mossadegh - Stephen Kinzer - Iranian Democracy" and Is their any connection with CIA 400 Million and Iran (U Tube)? The demand for fossil fuel will subside in the future and the demand for yellow cake (uranium) will rise aggressively. The politics surrounding the supply to the energy hungry world will intensify also.

Iran has got a lot of yellow cakes meaning potential and cheap energy. Russia, China, India and everyone one would love to have that supply of cheap energy but wish to acquire it in a friendly and businesses like manner. However, on the hand we have the so called “good guys”, i.e. the god fearing, human rights and democracy loving governments of USA and UK would like to get the yellow cake derived cheap energy from Iran by using terror and bully boy tactics. That’s why George Bush Authorized a $400 million plan to destabilize Iran back in 2007. Links such as Proof: Israeli Effort to Destabilize Iran Via Twitter along with US Official: The CIA bribed Iranian government officials including businessmen, and reporters, and paid Iranians to demonstrate in the streets and BBC Caught In Mass Public Deception With Iran Propaganda are only a few more of the emerging evidences to support this claim.


Like Dr. Mohammad Mossaddeq the current President Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is an honest person who does not have a big car, mansion or secret bank account. Both of them have enacted laws and other legislative mechanisms to empower the poor and oppressed of Iranian society. These activities and the stance they took must have angered the cruel and opportunistic outsiders and they are attacking and are in full swing at the expense of justice, fairness and the wellbeing of the Iranian people.
Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad knew all of these conspiracies and standard tactics. He could see them coming up ahead! As result, just after the election he went to Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi to ensure he had an insurance premium of a kind to counter against the USA, UK and Israeli linked “Triad”! Thankfully, many people in the West are waking up and they are foiling and spoiling the combined CIA, MI5 and Mossad plans by speaking out, demonstrating and acting against this wrongful interference.Mr. Barack Obama appears to be choosing his words very carefully as well he has replaced his Adviser on Iran, recently. However, it is creating a huge amount of tension between him and the neo-cons who are still active within the current USA government administration. These neo cons are adopting a subtle form of manipulation and persuasion within this government to do things the old fashioned way. Time will tell us who is to win and who is correct.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Melbourne Australia Taxi Strike

For pictures and original reports please click these links.
Melbourne Australia taxi strike

Union Leader Faruque Ahmed has been developing legal, technical, economic and political arguments in the thread LPG to Iraq and Discrimination against the oil industry. This so called Vice President of the dictatorial ATDA went on to forward invalid and futile argument against Faruque! Can we ask who do they work for - oil industry or taxi workers?!

They also opposed Faruque in Cabcharge and Criminals, Monopoly and de-Regulation of the Taxi Industry and many other burning pro-workers issues.

How long one can tolerate? Are they true friends of workers?

--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "union_faruque" wrote:
Re: melbourne Australia taxi strike
Why do I have to waste my time with a RACIST SON OF A BITCH who like the Channel Nine does not read the news papers or listens radio reports concerning a giant protest by genuine taxi drivers in Victoria and then questions, "why did they took off their shirts"?
Providing a safe workplace to the workers is the most basic duty of a civilized society and a fundamental right of any worker. Where is the "Duty of Care" YOU `white man'? Are you a friend of a taxi driver or arse licker of the taxi mafia?

On Thu, 1/5/08, Ross Nelson wrote:
From: Ross Nelson Subject: RE: [NSWTDAFORUM] NSW to Victorian Taxi Drivers' SafetyTo: "'union_faruque'" Received: Thursday, 1 May, 2008, 4:40 PM
Pray tell us ahmed, why did they take their shirts off?
One radio reporter said it was to show the colour of their skin because an element of the protesters wanted to play the race card.
rossco
--- In freeamericanow@yahoogroups.com, "Jodie" wrote:
Re: NSW to Victorian Taxi Drivers' Safety
Hi Taxi,
Your Blog was very interesting, and I'm glad to know you are involved in Taxi Drivers' Safety. The murders of the two taxi drivers sounded very bad, and dangerous.
Taxi, I hope you are doing well. Be very careful, and take care of yourself!!
NSW TAXI DRIVERS ASSOCIATIONINCORPORATING BAILEE DRIVERS, OWNER DRIVERS AND LESSEE DRIVERSInc.no. 9882558 ABN 98 653 928 763 PO Box 322, Alexandria NSW 2015
'A Fair Share of a Fair Fare'NSW to Victorian Taxi Drivers' Safety
Taxi drivers used to be expendable commodities like the ANZACS to the British. Greedy taxi networks and companies did nothing to save human lives. However, due to the courageous stand of a few dedicated taxi drivers, the NSW community got the Keatsdale Report, Dalziel Report and Cook Reports; all vital in achieving taxi driver safety. The grateful community of NSW gave enough money thorough the "$1.00 flag-fall rise" for taxi-drivers' safety with the GPS and screen recommendations of the Keatsdale Report. The NSW government then extracted $40.00 a day from the vulnerable taxi drivers for their own safety. In return they got unworkable cameras and unreliable GPS systems.
All of those little achievements are going to be buried by the partisan Madden Report- under the leadership of the NSW Labor Government. Tragically this $1000.00 per word David Madden Report is without any direction or vision whatsoever.In the meantime two more taxi drivers were brutally murdered in NSW and many more were robbed and injured.
Today with our Victorian colleagues stood up for their own safety in facing down the police in Melbourne.Channel Nine sinking to unfortunate disparagement and calculated derision of taxi drivers amounting to veiled racism could not resist the insult of describing the attention winning stunt on the part of the drivers of removing their shirts in the wintry weather thus " for reasons best known to themselves drivers removed their shirts". How puerile.Penultimately what drivers want here in NSW and undoubtedly Victoria is workable legislation, regulation and mechanisms ensuring workers' safety to save lives.
Media Manager, Mobile: 041 091 4118,
April 30, 2008

--- In NSWTDAEXEC@yahoogroups.com, "union_faruque" wrote:
Re: One way to get attention
Racist Channel Nine did not know why these people took their shirts off! The Victorian Labor Government should not have to play blind. Please follow these safety reports mentioned in NSW to Victorian Taxi Drivers' Safety and act in a sensible manner.
--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "mamubhi" wrote:Re: melbourne Australia taxi strike
You are welcome to examine the following in light of the NSW to Victorian Taxi Drivers' Safety.
--- In ozcabs@yahoogroups.com, Taxirob wrote: One way to get attention http://tools.goldcoast.com.au/stories/2536535.php
Source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ozcabs/message/27126
--- In ozcabs@yahoogroups.com, "Ross Nelson" wrote:
GOOD ON THE MELBOURNE TAXI DRIVER PROTESTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I would suggest caution re demanding that safety screens be mandated.
Sydney had screens mandated at the behest of the TWU.WE HATED THEM!!!90% of job satisfaction was blotted out.
Shouting to communicate with passengers is highly stressful. Vision is impaired . also stressful.The third to last Taxi Driver to be slain in Sydney (Saptul Singh Suri) had a screen in his cab.I believe that screens should be available for those that want them.
This could be a market based thing. If a base with 20 cabs has 10 with screens that are preferred over the non-screen cabs they will put more screens in.The taxi management that Peer calls 'mafia' made a lot of money out of installing screens in Sydney.
If Melbourne does go down this road I hope that the VTDA become major installers.RosscoWho hated driving a cab with a screen.
Source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ozcabs/message/27131
--- In ozcabs@yahoogroups.com, "Jimmy" wrote:
Spot on brother, exactly the same situation when in the post war years Australia imported the Migrant Factory Fodder. The difference being that those wogs had the balls to unionise and organise and the present taxi industry wogs ain't got the balls for jack all..........maybe with a handfull of exceptions. Well Victoria is taking the initiative when is NSW going to follow on......?.......or are they all too busy fighting amongst themselves and still trying to decide which TDA is going their way.
Sadly when you have a lacky of the Taxi Council for president in the NSWTDA and a secretary that is also that way inclined, is it any wonder that strike action is a no no?
A........ licking is the order of the day. Remember the NSW Taxi Council does not give a damn about bailee drivers. The expendible fodder sufficently manned by wogs who is going to worry?

Also consider who runs the NSW Taxi Council but a bunch of flea ridden geriatric Kangaroos.
An excellent point you made Taxifixer.
Remember Bob Woodger, he was an Aussie, and what support was there for his unfortunate demise?
Youbert Hormozi had an excellent turn out. I know I was at both of them.
For Woodger even a half an hour demo at parliament house was too much to ask for.
Yes I am a wog too and bloody well proud of it. But I am ashamed of the apathy of my collegue wogs.
--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "union_faruque" wrote:Re: melbourne Australia taxi strike
I am afraid the Minister of Transport and the Transport Workers Union mob may misguide or even sabotage this lawful demand of taxi drivers. Providing a safe work place regardless of the so
called relationship i.e. bailor/bailee is the fundamental right of any worker.
Here is a blatant example of profit overtaking civil rights, human rights and industrial rights of workers under the Victorian Labor Government.
I won't be surprised of any idiotic or racist remark from the `chardonnay revolutionaries' of the ozcabs forum. First of all their silence says, they may have isolated from the real taxi drivers' community or the drivers in general do not trust them in the first place. Anyway, their beloved Channel Nine made them proud tonight!


--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "taxifixer" wrote:
April 30, 2008
Hundreds of Melbourne taxi drivers have blocked a major city intersection demanding better safety after one of their own was critically injured in a stabbing.
Organisers say the protest will remain in place all night despite the arrest of a man this evening in connection with the stabbing.
An unidentified 23-year-old taxi driver, a student from India, was stabbed andcritically injured by a passenger in inner suburban Clifton Hill about 3am, police said.
By late today, more than 1,000 people - almost exclusively from the Indian sub-continent and the Middle East- braved temperatures down to single digits for the sit-inat the corner of Flinders and Swanston streets, in the heart of Melbourne.
Unknown to the crowd, a 45-year-old man was arrested at his Alphington home about 7.30pm, police said.
Parish Charles has been charged with attempted murder by Yarra detectives, police said.
He appeared before an out-of-sessions court hearing and was remanded in custody to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates' Court tomorrow.
Protesters began gathering at the intersection about 6pm, with word of the protest spreading via mobile phones.
Empty taxis and abandoned trams choked Swanston Street, one of Melbourne's busiest tram routes, as the protesters gathered in the shadow of Flinders Street station, watched by scores of police.
Cabs, many double-parked, lay idle for blocks as the peaceful but sometimes rowdy protest gathered strength.
The protesters demanded improved safety, including the introduction of protective screens for drivers.
One of the organisers, Indian-born taxi driver Jazz Randyboy, said cabbies wanted action.
"We get sick of complaining to the Victoria Police about our security. One of our friends was stabbed seven times and the cops are doing nothing. They say they can't get him," Mr Randyboy said.
"This is about getting our security, getting our rights back."
The Victorian government must guarantee driver safety by introducing protective screens, he said.
Many drivers believed police would put more effort into investigating an attack on a white driver, he said.
"There is too much racism in the Victoria Police. One police officer said to me that I am black and we bring all these problems into the country," he said.
"We think Australia is one of the best countries but after these experiences we think it's one of the worst. This is the most racist country in the world," he said.
Protesters will hold their ground overnight, Mr Randyboy said.
"It's going right through to tomorrow morning. They are not going home or do anything else. They will sit here until the government or someone talks to us."
One of the protesters told the crowd: "We will be sitting here as long as it is required. We just want justice".
Another yelled: "We're not going home. We're not going to take this shit anymore."
Victorian Public Transport Minister Lynne Kosky said earlier today protective screens were being trialled and could soon be introduced in taxis for drivers who wanted them.
Late this evening, ABC Online reported that Ms Kosky would meet with taxi industry representatives tomorrow.AAP

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Free Speech and Pedophiles Uncle

Free Speech and Pedophiles Uncle



Further to Peer’s Peers and NSW Bailees Do Not Receive Entitlements many people including “taxifixer” refuses to contribute in the NSW TDA forum due to the infamous practice of selective free speech.

Peer,

Are you attacking me personally because I stood up for taxi drivers’ right at the NSW IRC? Once you describe CC Connor as Mad Connor in your scabbie magazine and in the post below you called him “Justice Connor”! Do you understand the difference between CC Connor, "Mad Connor" and “Justice Connor”?

Anyway, to increase your knowledge please read Mike Hatrick below.

“The following day, a number of taxi drivers were frog marched behind the "messiah" Robert Mayell at the Industrial Commission in front of CC Connor (NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993).
No one is suggesting any conspiracy here! Poor Faruque and a few taxi drivers busted in anger and confronted the "messiah" Robert Mayell and the Transport Workers Union lawyer Adam Hatcher. During that time those new taxi drivers of Granville asked Faruque to be quiet and follow Meyall. Faruque told them, "I do not know who you are and I have not seen you in any of TWU meetings earlier – who are you people and what is the game going on here"?
Later many of these people confessed to Faruque and others that they were not even members of the TWU, many of them were not financial members of the union and the taxi bosses encouraged them to join in the TWU!
During the proceedings, the TWU lawyer said to CC Connor, "we reserve the right to oppose at a later date".
The good CC Connor found the opportunity and then he keenly passed the responsibility of gas and wash to the bailees without any compensation whatsoever. He did so despite strenuous objections made to him by Faruque and other drivers.

The decision by CC Connor did not change the bailor/bailee remuneration principle or law, but he made a decision which was not opposed by the parties.”


“Today, who is increasing the LPG price and on what basis no one knows or cares. The net impact is the weaker party in the chain is carrying the burden while "taxi mafia" is laughing all the way to the bank. The TWU lawyer Adam Hatcher found a chamber at the higher end of the town and become a BARRISTER! The good union boss Steve Hutchins became the president of the NSW Labor Party and eventually a number one ticket SENATOR from NSW.

Taxi drivers made an appeal to the Full Bench.

After a long and costly exercise, we found out that only the TWU have the right to represent taxi drivers at the Industrial Commission! During that hearing the rights and wrongs of the actual case were not discussed.
That means, in reality the court said the TWU can do whatever they like and they can ignore their own taxi driver members all together or their welfare! They are virtually not answerable to anyone. The union bosses do not have to follow justice, fairness, courtesy or common sense!
Since then the union removed a few bi-laws of their own constitution i.e. they don't have to advance the well being of their own members". The law is same today.”

Source: LPG to Iraq and Discrimination



--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "taxifixer" wrote:
Peer
When driver fronts up to a bailor and asks for work and the bailor offers a job with the sniffof work a tantalizing probability if the worker will listen to the mention of foregoing AnnualLeave for lower than ceiling pay ins I call that thinly veiled coercion and the grub making theoffer no better than a pedophiles uncle
Mike Hatrick

Source: http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/Sydney_TaxiCorruption/message/1047



--- In NSWTDAFORUM@yahoogroups.com, Peer Lindholdt wrote:
Re: Digest Number 990

Re: Digest Number 990Posted by: "union_faruque" http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/NSWTDAFORUM/post?postID=XPC553ejZLrmIVSQ1UDIfslJgq9UsvBm-osl4501HtUxkxlcPf8BUhs2BMcz-pZznFIQ6f2cyUQye9vOowLds6foeQ union_faruqueFri Apr 18, 2008 11:02 am (PDT)
> Peer,
Are you familiar with Case and Statute Law? In law, there is nothing called trade off! If you want to know more then ask CIM Miller. By the way, have you ever been to the IRC in your life?>
Faruque,
if you had bothered to read my posting properly you would have noticed I wrote "a gentleman's agreement" which is obviously not legally binding but is generally considered morally so, at least amongst decent folk.

Yes I have been at IRC taxi hearings twice. Once I even watched you stand up and make a fool of yourself. Even Justice Connor found it amusing and let you rave on longer than usual.
PEER




--- In NSWTDAFORUM@yahoogroups.com, "union_faruque" wrote:
Re: Digest Number 990

Peer,
Are you familiar with Case and Statute Law? In law, there is nothing called trade off! If you want to know more then ask CIM Miller. By the way, have you ever been to the IRC in your life?


--- In NSWTDAFORUM@yahoogroups.com, Peer Lindholdt wrote:

Ted,
firstly NSW drivers were not awarded entitlements, only Sydney drivers (see your points 1 and 2).

Secondly, in a previous posting here I explained the 3 reasons why most drivers don¹t get entitlements:

They don¹t drive enough shifts either by choice or because their operator won¹t let them; they don¹t ask for them or they have a gentleman¹s agreement to offset them against lower pay-ins. That the latter doesn¹t legally stand up in the IRC should the driver be a prick and still demand holiday pay later is irrelevant to this debate.

My information is that all full-time bailee drivers at the base at Cabcharge HQ and all at Lime get their entitlements. I have also spoken to many other drivers who do. We always did at TCS in Paddington provided we asked for them.

The Taxi Council has a strong argument in the IRC, backed by the claims below (1 & 2), for operators to be allowed to trade off entitlements by a set figure against lower pay-ins.

There is a strong rumour that the TC intends to apply to the IRC that method 2 be scrapped in favour of method 1 (50/50 split). That would presently cost many drivers dearly as the earn more than the pay-ins but in a recession would be to the drivers¹ advantage. Also, their income would not be affected by fuel prices as the operator pays for fuel under method 1. Maybe the NSW TDA should start telling its members to choose method 1.

The figure used by IPART of $4,000 towards entitlements is obviously inadequate if an operator has 2 full-time drivers, which makes him liable for $8,000, as shown in the PwC model.

You frankly don¹t know what you are talking about when you say ³... that has been the case for so long that operators with impunity do NOT allow for the payment and cost of Entitlements in the Payins.². The notional cost of entitlements is INCLUDED in the pay-ins ($4,000). The operator can¹t not allow for them, they are there, in the cost model. If they discount that's their choice, their gamble.

The idiocy of the IPART and PwC models is that if an operator avoids paying entitlements by whichever method, he pockets the money himself and there is no simple way of fixing that problem. And that is an incentive to operators not to give their drivers 5 shifts a week especially if there is a glut of drivers which will happen soon enough.

As I have said before, the only fair way to fix the problem is for IPART and the IRC to agree that ALL drivers who regularly drive 3 shifts or more p.w. be classified as permanent full-time drivers and that operators MUST charge the maximum pay-in and pay entitlements to such drivers. A lower maximum pay-in could be set for casual drivers.

That is what the NSW TDA and ATDA should have pushed for in their submissions. Why should cabbies have to work 60 hours a week to get holiday pay when other workers only have to work 40 or less?

The only other alternative is to scrap entitlements altogether and have lower maximum pay-ins. The Taxi Council would love that.
Cheers
PEER

Monday, December 24, 2007

LPG to Iraq

LPG to Iraq


Further to the “untouchable” NSW ALP President Steve Hutchins and Adam Hatcher saga below (Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies), we have requested the ACCC to include LPG, Petrol, Kerosene, Dassel and Lube Oil (Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies in Australia) in their watch list instead of only unleaded as mentioned by Chairman Mr. Graeme Samuel.

In the Science and Commerce article we made an attempt to say, “Scientifically speaking, i.e. chemical structure, energy ratio or content, mileage etc. etc., if the Diesel price is $A1.50/L then the Petrol should be below $A0.75/L and the LPG must be less than $A0.35/L.”

It is also important to remind everyone that the LPG is a cleaner and greener product than many other petroleum products and therefore a good government should encourage and facilitate more usage of the LPG.

Last year I was surprised to find out, “the LPG was around $A0.30/L in Victoria while in NSW the same product was $A0.50/L. It appears the state government may have some role in affecting the price of these products. In any case the public must know these factors and the ACCC can ensure accountability, transparency and openness in the whole episode. The other important fact is that the LPG does not attract state and federal tax and duties like petrol and therefore recent LPG price hikes got the smell of price fixing, collusion and other unethical activities behind the scene.

The ACCC, media and other authorities must examine all of these issues for the good of the public and country immediately.

Remember, Iraq was not invaded to “liberate” Iraqis, spread “democracy” or remove “weapons of mass destruction”! The tragedy was organized and executed for oil, profit and power.




Science and Commerce

Beside the principled argument of taxi fixer let me say the followings.

Scientifically speaking, i.e. chemical structure, energy ratio or content, mileage etc. etc., if the Diesel price is $A1.50/L then the Petrol should be below $A0.75/L and the LPG must be less than $A0.35/L.

However, due to the irrational economic rationalism, these days;
Diesel is $A1.50/L,
Petrol is $A1.40/L and
LPG is $A0.70/L.

It would be a wise idea to talk to the Australian Petroleum Institute or other scientific bodes about this blatant anomalies. The ACC may initiate this dialogue along with the scientific facts mentioned above inline with Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies in Australia.

Source: Sydney Taxi Corruption


--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "taxifixer" wrote:
Re: Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies

As a Method 1 bailee driver in Sydney I am not required to pay for the cost of fuel by way of the Taxi Industry (Contract Drivers) Contract Determination 1984,On Method 2 so called ' bailee drivers' are required to fork out the extra $40.00 / shift ...or so to pay for fuel.Little wonder that when the president of the TDA when wearing his other hat as champion of the bailor that he works for, will go so far as to appear for the bailor side of the industry in the NSW Industrial Relations Commission against bailee drivers who choose to Method 1 as he did several years ago- only to be demolished by the TWU lawyer.Also having opted to go with Method 2 pay in for the fuel is the wages of sin.Suckers- if you opt for a Method that facilitates massive tax evasion and avoidance- amethod that flies in the face of the massive legal precedent set down by the Justice Beattie report into the industry and opt for a method arrived at by legal chicanery then suffer you must.The bailor and the fuel companies are laughing ....

taxifixer
Source: Sydney Taxi Corruption


--- In Sydney_TaxiCorruption@yahoogroups.com, "union_faruque" wrote:
Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies in Australia


It appears, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission do not know the fact that one can make millions of products out of a black substance called Crude Oil. The refiners make these products under certain conditions, pressure and temperature at the oil refineries based on the market requirement. Right now the main products in the Australian market are the L.P.G., petrol, kerosene, diesel and lubricating oil.

An intelligent organization with integrity must be watching all of these products, profit margins, price fluctuations and possible links behind any changes. According to Mr. Graeme Samuel of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, his organization is only watching the unleaded petrol prices to change the world.

However, the giant ACCC and Australian Government got millions of well paid and connected advisers and experts. One can hope they will ensure public good and fairness while they discharge their responsibilities.

Remember, taxi drivers are waiting for Removal of Cabcharge Decals from Taxis.




--- In NSWTDAFORUM@yahoogroups.com, "Cabbie Rights" wrote:

Well done Faruque,For once I read a post worthy of a media manager there is hope for you yet!The sad part being, that neither the TWU who don't give a shit, or the NSWTDA who are totally impotent as is the ATDA in this matter or any TDA in any state. It is obvious for anyone that pauses to think, that the oil companies in the present price hike are playing 'pay back' to Labor Australia and unless Kevin Rudd and his team takes a strong stand we are going to be screwed by the capitalist monopolies.What that stand should be, I have no idea as there has never been one single government to my knowledge be it Labor or Liberal that has the balls to tackle the oil companies and win. I may be wrong in this, and if the great historians of the Taxi industry have any corrections to this statment then I would be most happy to be corrected.So my dear collegues, tighten your belts and TRY and have a happy festive season.Remember Christmas is a time for caring and sharing, and we who have so little and try to share with others what little we have may be twice blessed.Peace and blessings to ALL

Jimmy
NSW TDA Forum



Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies

According to the law of the land, the bailor is responsible for fuel and wash.

However, at the Industrial Relations Commission the "taxi mafia" made an application to pass the responsibility of fuel and wash to the bailees without any compensation whatsoever.

Further to ICAC Submission, long long ago; a "phantom strike" was called at Granville Taxi Base, Sydney, NSW of the `lucky country'! The TWU trouble shooter named Robert Mayell who used to work around the adjacent area quickly went over there and negotiated a settlement! The `Pay-in' went down by five dollars!!

The following day, a number of taxi drivers were frog marched behind the "messiah" Robert Mayell at the Industrial Commission in front of CC Connor (NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993).

No one is suggesting any conspiracy here! Poor Faruque and a few taxi drivers busted in anger and confronted the "messiah" Robert Mayell and the Transport Workers Union lawyer Adam Hatcher. During that time those new taxi drivers of Granville asked Faruque to be quiet and follow Meyall. Faruque told them, "I do not know who you are and I have not seen you in any of TWU meetings earlier – who are you people and what is the game going on here"?

Later many of these people confessed to Faruque and others that they were not even members of the TWU, many of them were not financial members of the union and the taxi bosses encouraged them to join in the TWU!

During the proceedings, the TWU lawyer said to CC Connor, "we reserve the right to oppose at a later date".

The good CC Connor found the opportunity and then he keenly passed the responsibility of gas and wash to the bailees without any compensation whatsoever. He did so despite strenuous objections made to him by Faruque and other drivers.

The decision by CC Connor did not change the bailor/bailee remuneration principle or law, but he made a decision which was not opposed by the parties.

A few weeks later the LPG price jumped from $A0.20-$A0.30/L to $A0.50-$A0.60/L.

An application was made to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on a different ground. After a futile exercise, the price went down for a while.

Today, who is increasing the LPG price and on what basis no one knows or cares. The net impact is the weaker party in the chain is carrying the burden while "taxi mafia" is laughing all the way to the bank. The TWU lawyer Adam Hatcher found a chamber at the higher end of the town and become a BARRISTER! The good union boss Steve Hutchins became the president of the NSW Labor Party and eventually a number one ticket SENATOR from NSW.

Taxi drivers made an appeal to the Full Bench.

After a long and costly exercise, we found out that only the TWU have the right to represent taxi drivers at the Industrial Commission! During that hearing the rights and wrongs of the actual case were not discussed.

That means, in reality the court said the TWU can do whatever they like and they can ignore their own taxi driver members all together or their welfare! They are virtually not answerable to anyone. The union bosses do not have to follow justice, fairness, courtesy or common sense! Since then the union removed a few bi-laws of their own constitution i.e. they don't have to advance the well being of their own members". The law is same today.

Whether we drivers like it or not, even if the TWU got any taxi driver members or not they will decide the bailee taxi drivers working conditions. No matter, how sad, immoral and unlawful they are.

Faruque and others used to expose them in the media. However, the union bosses used to make attempts to trap taxi drivers and block them from the media, parliament, etc. etc. Some of the documents are very revealing.

I say, the most tragic thing of my life is that knowing and dealing with the NSW Transport Workers Union.

Thursday, December 20, 2007


Ted Hirsch wrote:

From memory, about 4-5 weeks ago gas rose to a minimum 55/ litre and up to 70/litre.After cabbies got used to the shock, then a week or two ago it rose to minimum 65/litre and up to 75/litre.Did you say price gouging, Brian? Tut, tut. But Yes, getting our Media Manager onto it sounds worthwhile !On Wed 19Dec07 in the SMH, Gordon Samuels announced that the ACCC inquiry had NOT found any evidence of petrol price collusion. And Coles and Woolies dockets were cleared from accusations of higher shelf prices. Independent servos disappearing was is part of a long term trend, although they are hotly contesting this finding (self interest obviously). It is proposed to introduce a daily petrol price information scheme, popular in WA and which has reduced volatile price changes to once per day. By 4pm the next day's price is shown on the computer. No mention of gas prices or gouging by the ACCC, of course.

Our in house historian Mr. Ahmed, tells of an IRC "temporary decision" some years ago which, thanks to the TWU made drivers pay for fuel, whereas previously Bailors paid (or bailors/ bailees split the costs?). Faruque reckons taking this to the IRC for review is too difficult and costly. He reckons Parliament, somehow. Any specific advice, Faruque?Ernie suggest IPART gives us a handout for fuel price increases. That's the easiest approach, no doubt, albeit in June/July from memory and a massive amount of work if we do the full Monty! (Should IPART be added to our Calendar?) (BTW, why are radio jobs so poorly returned, Ernie? Cheers to all.

Ted


Ernie Mollenhauer wrote:

As bus fares have just been increased, their explanation being increased costs, I reckon there are more than reasonable grounds to pester Ipart for an increase in taxi fares. The other string in the bow would be the currently poor responses to radio booking which are now even less attractive than before. Is there support for a claim, (seeking to leave the meters alone) for an increase in the radio booking fee to say $3 so they can knock us back to $2?

Ernie



On 19/12/2007, Brian Ridge <http://post?postID=TLaweS6l8GxMBu8-oHHFsW55SWup1o6YOq_rP-UnQOKN2F3cnLGuqeurQHKXPeEPVTnivcWaNmkHwLU> wrote:

To the committee, Last night while filling my cab with gas at the Legion base at 65.9 cents per litre another driver told me he had narrowly avoided paying 74.9 at Crows Nest, and he estimated that it was costing him about $100 a week extra. My recollection is that when the fare rates were increased back about July the cost of gas rose from about 48 to 52 cents per litre. If my memory is correct that equates to about a 40% rise in less than 6 months. The term "price gouging" springs to mind. I am wondering whether the NSWTDA could do a bit of probing and perhaps create a bit of noise so that these prices are justified.

Brian
Source: NSW TDA Executive

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies

Ghost and Gas – No Conspiracies


According to the law of the land, the bailor is responsible for fuel and wash.

However, at the Industrial Relations Commission the “taxi mafia” made an application to pass the responsibility of fuel and wash to the bailees without any compensation whatsoever.

Further to ICAC Submission, long long ago; a “phantom strike” was called at Granville Taxi Base, Sydney, NSW of the ‘lucky country’! The TWU trouble shooter named Robert Mayell who used to work around the adjacent area quickly went over there and negotiated a settlement! The ‘Pay-in’ went down by five dollars!!

The following day, a number of taxi drivers were frog marched behind the “messiah” Robert Mayell at the Industrial Commission in front of CC Connor (NSW IRC Matter No 2383 of 1993).

No one is suggesting any conspiracy here! Poor Faruque and a few taxi drivers busted in anger and confronted the “messiah” Robert Mayell and the Transport Workers Union lawyer Adam Hatcher. During that time those new taxi drivers of Granville asked Faruque to be quiet and follow Meyall. Faruque told them, “I do not know who you are and I have not seen you in any of TWU meetings earlier – who are you people and what is the game going on here”?

Later many of these people confessed to Faruque and others that they were not even members of the TWU, many of them were not financial members of the union and the taxi bosses encouraged them to join in the TWU!

During the proceedings, the TWU lawyer said to CC Connor, “we reserve the right to oppose at a later date”.

The good CC Connor found the opportunity and then he keenly passed the responsibility of gas and wash to the bailees without any compensation whatsoever. He did so despite strenuous objections made to him by Faruque and other drivers.

The decision by CC Connor did not change the bailor/bailee remuneration principle or law, but he made a decision which was not opposed by the parties.
A few weeks later the LPG price jumped from $A0.20-$A0.30/L to $A0.50-$A0.60/L.

An application was made to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on a different ground. After a futile exercise, the price went down for a while.

Today, who is increasing the LPG price and on what basis no one knows or cares. The net impact is the weaker party in the chain is carrying the burden while “taxi mafia” is laughing all the way to the bank. The TWU lawyer Adam Hatcher found a chamber at the higher end of the town and become a BARRISTER! The good union boss Steve Hutchins became the president of the NSW Labor Party and eventually a number one ticket SENATOR from NSW.

Taxi drivers made an appeal to the Full Bench.

After a long and costly exercise, we found out that only the TWU have the right to represent taxi drivers at the Industrial Commission! During that hearing the rights and wrongs of the actual case were not discussed.

That means, in reality the court said the TWU can do whatever they like and they can ignore their own taxi driver members all together or their welfare! They are virtually not answerable to anyone. The union bosses do not have to follow justice, fairness, courtesy or common sense! Since then the union removed a few bi-laws of their own constitution i.e. they don’t have to advance the well being of their own members”. The law is same today.

Whether we drivers like it or not, even if the TWU got any taxi driver members or not they will decide the bailee taxi drivers working conditions. No matter, how sad, immoral and unlawful they are.

Faruque and others used to expose them in the media. However, the union bosses used to make attempts to trap taxi drivers and block them from the media, parliament, etc. etc. Some of the documents are very revealing.

I say, the most tragic thing of my life is that knowing and dealing with the NSW Transport Workers Union.


Thursday, December 20, 2007




Ted Hirsch wrote:

From memory, about 4-5 weeks ago gas rose to a minimum 55/ litre and up to 70/litre.After cabbies got used to the shock, then a week or two ago it rose to minimum 65/litre and up to 75/litre.Did you say price gouging, Brian? Tut, tut. But Yes, getting our Media Manager onto it sounds worthwhile !

On Wed 19Dec07 in the SMH, Gordon Samuels announced that the ACCC inquiry had NOT found any evidence of petrol price collusion. And Coles and Woolies dockets were cleared from accusations of higher shelf prices. Independent servos disappearing was is part of a long term trend, although they are hotly contesting this finding (self interest obviously). It is proposed to introduce a daily petrol price information scheme, popular in WA and which has reduced volatile price changes to once per day. By 4pm the next day's price is shown on the computer. No mention of gas prices or gouging by the ACCC, of course.Our in house historian

Mr. Ahmed, tells of an IRC "temporary decision" some years ago which, thanks to the TWU made drivers pay for fuel, whereas previously Bailors paid (or bailors/ bailees split the costs?).

Faruque reckons taking this to the IRC for review is too difficult and costly. He reckons Parliament, somehow. Any specific advice, Faruque?Ernie suggest IPART gives us a handout for fuel price increases. That's the easiest approach, no doubt, albeit in June/July from memory and a massive amount of work if we do the full Monty! (Should IPART be added to our Calendar?) (BTW, why are radio jobs so poorly returned, Ernie?

Cheers to all.Ted



Ernie Mollenhauer wrote:

As bus fares have just been increased, their explanation being increased costs, I reckon there are more than reasonable grounds to pester Ipart for an increase in taxi fares. The other string in the bow would be the currently poor responses to radio booking which are now even less attractive than before. Is there support for a claim, (seeking to leave the meters alone) for an increase in the radio booking fee to say $3 so they can knock us back to $2?

Ernie



On 19/12/2007, Brian Ridge < brianfridge@msn.com> wrote:


To the committee, Last night while filling my cab with gas at the Legion base at 65.9 cents per litre another driver told me he had narrowly avoided paying 74.9 at Crows Nest, and he estimated that it was costing him about $100 a week extra. My recollection is that when the fare rates were increased back about July the cost of gas rose from about 48 to 52 cents per litre. If my memory is correct that equates to about a 40% rise in less than 6 months. The term "price gouging" springs to mind. I am wondering whether the NSWTDA could do a bit of probing and perhaps create a bit of noise so that these prices are justified. Brian

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

An Open Letter to Geoff or Anyone Who Cares

An Open Letter to Geoff or Anyone Who Cares


Further to Bhutto to Beggar, Nitrogenous waste from a mental and Debate with Idiots look like we are surrounded by vultures. These vultures have been doing anything and everything possible for their narrow personal gains! We have been fighting against them very successfully. It is hard, difficult and exhausting. However, it is worthwhile.

I can not find any logic, moral or legality behind an idea of abandoning such a moral cause and course! Because, these self-cantered greedy people want the money and power. They are not interested in Taxi Drivers’ welfare. They are shameless. Peoples are waking up and they will be condemned. I have noticed the sign during last Sunday’s meeting! A few drivers from the ‘other side’ got sick and tired of their own friends and expressed their solidarity with us.

These vultures attacked you mercilessly for an innocent mistake of yours and they wanted embarrass you further you for you honourable act. These dishonest people are unable to hold their AGM and other meetings in the local toilet blocks! These self-cantered and greedy people failed to present an independently audited “financial report” during their tenure! In my book, they are worse than a common thief. Most of these disgusting individuals are serial bankrupt and they have bankrupted the NSW TDA account!

You yourself witnessed during the highest level meeting at the Airport, ‘shonky’ Jools was embarrassingly quiet in a corner and he had nothing to contribute! You also can not ignore the fact that these peoples’ combined arrogance and ignorance made the Mac Bank laughing stock of the town and the taxi mafia is smiling!

We did the right thing according to the NSW Supreme Court direction and our membership also did the right thing by expelling these cancerous cells. I said to them before and saying it again, “I’ll see then at the High Court”.

Most of us a decent and hard working people unlike these handful professional crooks! I believe It is our moral obligation to protect the NSW TDA fund and further taxi drivers interest.

We can not walk out from our moral and legal responsibility. We can give in to criminal entity.

Trust me, we will ensure them their place in history.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

"A SUBMISSION CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION

"A SUBMISSION CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTIONWITHIN THE N.S.W. TAXI INDUSTRY: A CAUSE FOR PUBLICCONCERN AND INVESTIGATION."

Date of Submission: 24 July 1998.

From:Faruque Ahmed,
President,
Taxi Drivers' Section, NSW TWU,
6/12 Woodbury Street, Marrickville, 2204.
Phone - (02) 9564 1079, Fax 9559 6030, Mobile 0418 227 551.


To:
Independent Commission Against Corruption
Cnr George and Cleveland Street,
Redfern, 2016, New South Wales,
Fax - (02) 9699 8067.

Dear Commissioner,


I begin with two questions:

(1) Why has the Premier of New South Wales, Mr. Bob Carr, continually and consistently thwarted numerous submissions calling on the Parliamentary Stay Safe Committee to mount a full and open inquiry into the N.S.W. Taxi Industry, despite the matter having broad cross-party and cross-factional support?
(2) Why has the N.S.W. Ombudsman's Office, after a preliminary 0examination of some of the evidence presented below, privately suggested that the evidence would be more appropriately forwarded to the ICAC for examination?

Read On
Source: Sydney Taxi Corruption